Monday, December 2, 2019
Mrs Johnstone and Mrs Lyons Paper I have chosen to do a script interviewing Mrs Johnstone and Mrs Lyons. Interviewer: Mrs Johnstone how did it feel giving up one of your sons? Mrs Johnstone: It felt terrible, and the guilt still hunts me but I did what I thought was right, at least one of my sons would have a successful life. Interviewer: Mrs Lyons how does it feel having to lie to your husband that Edward isnt really your son Mrs Lyons: I knew my husband wouldnt agree but this is what I wanted. We brought up Edward as our own and weather or not our blood flows through him Edward is part of the Lyons family. Interviewer: Mrs Lyons how did you feel knowing you where taking away someones child and after not letting the true mother see her child Mrs Lyons: I didnt take her son away we both agreed on the matter and she had the power to say no in which she did not consider. I had to sack her not for my benefit but for the Childs. Interviewer: Mrs Johnstone do you agree or disagree that if you hadnt of given up one of your sons their deaths would not have occurred We will write a custom essay sample on Mrs Johnstone and Mrs Lyons specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Mrs Johnstone and Mrs Lyons specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Mrs Johnstone and Mrs Lyons specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Mrs Johnstone: thats hard to say thats a yes and no answer, on earth we are all meant to die and their time was just simply up it was inevitable, but yet the way they died wouldnt have happened if they knew they where brothers. Evaluation: This exercise helped me greatly to understand about family separation. By doing this exercise I had a much better understanding of Mrs Lyons and Mrs Johnstone character. This situation is very realistic because a lot of child separations are due to the parents this proves that most separations are from the parents decisions. And in this case this is a single parent not being able to cope with more children. Mrs Lyons character is very superstitious and manipulative, she could see that Mrs Johnstone was weak and so she took advantage. From this I could see that Mrs Johnstone feels only guilt, and she didnt have much choice with Mrs Lyons manipulating her. This story reminds me of someone I know very well, he was separated from his parent and sister because of a new family member who was married to his mother. His father had left long ago and hadnt been seen since, and his stepfather didnt get on with him very well. He and his sister seemed to do everything wrong which leaded to physical contact. Manipulative their mother ended up putting them into care. I sympathise with the step father because he clearly is insecure, and his very jealous. He feels that he is superior to the family and over powers them. Family separation seems really depressing because of all the lies that there is. There seems to be so much pain between them, and just feels really horrible altogether. And a lot of the time theres one parent manipulating another. Role of the narrator: The scene we worked on was the scene with Mickey and Sammy where the robbery situation occurs and Mickey is arrested. We wanted to narrator to be very suspicious and come across to the audience very evil. We aimed to do this by his body language and posture, through his tone of voice and facial expressions. We wanted the narrator to act with the characters as their conscience, he was very ghost like and watching the characters actions as they where committed. This brought dramatic tension upon the characters and audience in which it showed he was in control. When speaking to the characters he was very manipulative by speaking smoothly to make his sentence last longer, and stay in the characters head. He would also repeat himself to keep reminding the characters. He would keep constantly telling Mickey he was a killer which could represent his thoughts. The narrator would move slowly in and out of the characters in the scene which was creepy and very effective. We wouldnt use any spot lighting because this wouldnt be so effective. By the narrator being seen only by the audience and contrasting with the other characters was interesting. By there being a spotlight on the narrator wouldnt be so effective. By there being no sound effects would make it seem tenser. Staging the contrast between Mickey and Edwards lives: We did this in the same room by both set differently to show there difference. We set up Edwardss classroom scene in neat rows to show that they are higher class. The pupils body language showed there status, they would be sitting up straight with good posture. They would be in neat uniform ties done up, shirt tucked in, hair very neat and in silence. From this you can clearly see that the pupils receive the best education in an orderly manner. You can also tell the school is very wealthy from how the class is presented, the uniform and what the pupils are studying. The teacher is already in the classroom walking backwards and forwards observing the pupils work. From the teachers body language you can tell he is very strict, walking upright and proud in which the pupils are in silence not daring to speak, with a cane in his hand. Lighting in this scene would focus on all the characters. Edwardss scene is an all boys school. Mickeys a mixed school this is very stereotypical of class. To contrast with this we had Mickeys classroom on the opposite side of the room. This would be set very differently, the chairs out of place, uncontrollable mess and paper aeroplanes around the room. The pupils seemed relaxed and not bothered at all slouching on their chairs and staring into space. Their uniform would be very untidy buttons undone and ties lose. The teacher also seemed very untidy but this tells the audience that he is tied and cant control the kids.
Wednesday, November 27, 2019
trifles essays Throughout time women have broken off the shorter end of the stick against men. Even when women have been correct and justified in their opinions, they have often been ignored and had their opinions and thoughts vanquished. Sometimes men will amuse women by taking their thoughts into consideration, but many times the real essence of what a woman says is lost in the rolling of eyes and laughter or scorn of men. How many times do husbands ask for directions when their wives have told them they are lost? This may seem a trivial episode, but underlying it is superiority felt by men towards women. However men do not realize that their own conceit holds them back, and does not bring them to higher ground. In order to counter this, women tend to keep to themselves in many cases, knowing their opinions will not be considered. In the drama Trifles it is many times nuances and innuendos, and not facts, that the women use to express their thoughts. In this way women will often know the truth qu ietly, while men will think they know the truth loudly. In the beginning of the play, the County Attorney remarks upon how dirty the towels in the kitchen are. To him, the towels are just that, towels. They do not indicate to him anything about the way of life in which Mr. And Mrs. Wright lived. He cannot see such indicators because he does not look for them. He does not look for them because he does not know how to. He is not sensitive to the goings on in the household. However, when Mrs. Hale defends Mrs. Wright, Those towels get dirty awful quick. Mens hands arent always as clean as they might be, the County Attorney brushes her off as simple loyalty to her sex. The Attorney is missing a clue in the towel. However Mrs. Hale is quick to note that a dirty towel could mean an abusive husband. Without saying that Mr. Wright was abusive, Mrs. Hale says that his hands arent as clean, or his mann ...
Saturday, November 23, 2019
The Return of the Dangling Modifiers The Return of the Dangling Modifiers The Return of the Dangling Modifiers By Mark Nichol Like the compositional equivalent of lurching zombies, dangling modifiers insistently, incessantly assault the sensibilities of careful writers (and careful readers). IÃ¢â¬â¢ve posted several sets of examples of these misbegotten misconstructions in which an erroneously constructed sentence subject is at odds with the modifying phrase that precedes it, but they keep on coming. Here, in honor of Halloween, I execute another sordid sortie of such monstrous errors. 1. Ã¢â¬Å"A biostatistician by training, SmithÃ¢â¬â¢s initial study of alcohol as a disease was funded by Jones.Ã¢â¬ SmithÃ¢â¬â¢s initial study is not a biostatistician by training; he is. Therefore, the modifier (in this case an appositive, a word or phrase that takes the place of another word or phrase: Smith and Ã¢â¬Å"a biostatistician by trainingÃ¢â¬ refer to the same entity) should follow the subject, so that the sentence reads, Ã¢â¬Å"Smith was a biostatistician by training, and his initial study of alcohol as a disease was funded by Jones.Ã¢â¬ But this revision might alter the emphasis of the authorÃ¢â¬â¢s intended meaning. Ã¢â¬Å"Smith, a biostatistician by training, received funding from Jones for his initial study of alcohol as a diseaseÃ¢â¬ might adhere more closely to the original intent. 2. Ã¢â¬Å"After nearly four years behind bars, an Italian jury overturned her conviction for the murder of her roommate.Ã¢â¬ If I had been part of that incarcerated panel, I would have avoided the jail time by overturning the defendantÃ¢â¬â¢s conviction four years earlier. For this sentence to say what itÃ¢â¬â¢s trying to say that the defendant, not the jury, was exonerated the defendant needs to be introduced in the introductory modifier: Ã¢â¬Å"After she spent nearly four years behind bars, an Italian jury overturned her conviction for the murder of her roommate.Ã¢â¬ 3. Ã¢â¬Å"As a member of a political minority in this area, itÃ¢â¬â¢s interesting how people here just assume you think the way they do.Ã¢â¬ It is not a minority, the writer is. Writers need not introduce themselves at the expense of the expletive itÃ¢â¬â¢s, but they do need to introduce themselves: Ã¢â¬Å"As a member of a political minority in this area, itÃ¢â¬â¢s interesting to me how people here just assume you think the way they do.Ã¢â¬ 4. Ã¢â¬Å"Born in Los Angeles, this isnÃ¢â¬â¢t the first time John Doe has sparked controversy with his artwork.Ã¢â¬ This sentence suffers from a distracting diversion similar to the one in the previous example; it identifies LA as the birthplace of this, rather than the hometown of John Doe. The statementÃ¢â¬â¢s awkward insertion of a detail that is both unimportant and unrelated to the main part of the sentence is easily remedied; reinsert the biographical detail as a parenthetical following SmithÃ¢â¬â¢s name: Ã¢â¬Å"This isnÃ¢â¬â¢t the first time John Doe, born in Los Angeles, has sparked controversy with his artwork.Ã¢â¬ 5. Ã¢â¬Å"Never a fan nor a detractor, the sheer insanity of the band excited and frightened me enough to stay three hours longer than I intended to.Ã¢â¬ The sheer insanity of the band is not its own fan or detractor the writer is. Therefore, the writer must be the subject of the sentence; I also introduced the modifier nevertheless to signal the contrast between expectation and outcome: Ã¢â¬Å"Never a fan nor a detractor, I was nevertheless excited and frightened enough by the sheer insanity of the band to stay three hours longer than I intended to.Ã¢â¬ Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:45 Synonyms for Ã¢â¬Å"FoodÃ¢â¬ When to Form a Plural with an ApostropheComment, Suggestion, and Feedback
Thursday, November 21, 2019
Without Prejudice--zhang - Essay Example The theory that applies the most to the TV show, Ã¢â¬Å"Without Prejudice,Ã¢â¬ is Judee BurgoonÃ¢â¬â¢s Expectation Violations Theory (EVT). The process of choosing someone to give $25,000 is based on expectancy, violation valence, and communicator reward valence. Violation valence refers to positive or negative values placed on particular unexpected behaviors. Communicator reward valence refers to the positive or negative attributes put into the encounter and the potential to reward or punish the behavior. The judges in the show had expectancy or expectations regarding communicator characteristics, which are basically comprised of demographics (i.e. race, age, educational background, gender and social class), physical appearance, personality and communication style. The judges made first impressions from how the candidates presented themselves through saying their names and where they are from, which their communicator characteristics affected. Dave, for instance, judged that Jo hn did not seem to need the money because of his physical demeanor. RJ would not give the money to Nancy at first because she is already old. Their prejudice on peopleÃ¢â¬â¢s age and physical characteristics affected their reward valence. The show also demonstrated violation valence and communicator reward valence. JJ showed positive facial expression when she learned that Jack was a Marine, which gave positive valence to Jack. However, when Jack revealed that after his service he got involved in the porn industry, JJ changed the valence into a negative one. JackÃ¢â¬â¢s porn activities violated JJÃ¢â¬â¢s expectancy from him as a changed man, since he became a soldier already. Communicator reward valence resulted to JJÃ¢â¬â¢s judgment that Jack does not deserve $25,000 because his work is Ã¢â¬Å"disgusting.Ã¢â¬ Learning that Jack is in the porn industry also earned him a negative
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
DARE Program - Research Paper Example In this essay, the proponent tries to discuss a brief overview of the program, a review of the effectiveness and or ineffectiveness of the program, changes that have been implemented to increase its effectiveness, and based on the findings of the research the proponent elaborately discusses grounds whether or not it is appropriate to continue to fund this program. Overview of DARE Founded in 1983 in Los Angeles, DARE aims to help children or young people from kindergarten through 12th grade not to be involved with peer pressures, drugs and violence, but ensure them to live productive lives (DARE America, 2012). This program guarantees children to improve their skills, and divert them to be more productive for them not to be associated with drugs, gangs and violence. Under this program, children are customarily given with classroom lessons in line with resisting peer pressures, and instead live a productive life free from drugs and matters concerning violence. Review of DAREÃ¢â¬â¢s effectiveness or ineffectiveness DARE program is claimed to be in line with hopelessly outmoded theories of human learning and behavior, it is a failure when it comes to distinguishing what a legal substance or illegal drug is, it generally considers all use as abuse, and it presents inconsistent view of substance with reference to what students actually observe in their environment (Hanson, 2011). All of these are important considerations that are deemed to be elemental reasons that could point out to the ineffectiveness of DARE program. Furthermore, Hanson also points out that DARE is a disaster for students but a specific accomplishment for those implementing and making profit from it. Hanson simply implies that the reason why DARE continuously exists is due to the fact that there is a remarkable advantage and benefits out of it especially on the part of those who implement it, and not so much of the children who actually should benefit from it. In line with the claim of Hanson, a study conducted by Clayton, Cattarello and Johnstone (1996) showed that there was no significant difference when drug or alcohol intervention was conducted on the 7th grade approximately after one year with DARE program and after a 5-year measurement interval. The result was able to show the information about the students in their 7th grade regarding their attitudes towards drugs, resisting peer pressure and level of drug use by peers. To support this further, evaluation regarding DAREÃ¢â¬â¢s effectiveness showed that studentÃ¢â¬â¢s knowledge, attitudes and behavior on drug prevention could be loss over time, which was substantially observed to come right after the program (Birkeland, Graham & Weiss, 2005). In fact, studentÃ¢â¬â¢s behaviors and perceptions are crucial to programs that at some point could associate DARE and its goals (Doulas & Lurigio, 2010; Champion, 2010). In other words, due to the fact that students who have undergone the DARE program will undergo adolesc ent stage and potential influence from the environment, it could not be perfectly relied on that they could have significant immunity against actual exposure to alcohol and drug abuse as their attitudes, behaviors or knowledge will change over time. These
Sunday, November 17, 2019
Animal Cruelty Essay To bring awareness to my audience about animal cruelty. Introduction: As humanity has grown, there has been an increase in authority and rules and regulations of everyday life. One of these rules is animal cruelty. Animal cruelty simply means cruel unjustified treatment of animals and sometimes pets to unnecessary harm and pain. One principal type of animal cruelty is torture. It is not ethical, moral, or legal but we humans do it.. One of the places we see the most animal cruelty is in the circuses. Animals in circuses are regularly and dangerously exposed to many abuses and diseases. Circuses do not practice what they preach and indulge in animal cruelty on a regular basis, after the training sessions of the circuses, tight collars, whips; beatings and torture are the order of the day for these animals. Elephants are one of the animals that suffer from major diseases in the circuses like tuberculosis and can infect humans with the bacterial disease. Some cases show that the elephants were not cured medically for wounds caused during beatings and other natural causes. Circuses have known to keep a large amount of soil ready, to hide the wounds and the blood on the elephants. Some elephants have also suffered from lameness, arthritis and food abscesses. Elephant deaths in circuses are normally caused due to osteoporosis. Elephants suffer from Osteoporosis simply because they do not have wide spaces to move around. Due to the cruel treatments, it has been proved that circus animals are dying at a higher rate than they are breeding. Circuses teach children that its acceptable to abuse and mistreat animals for amusement Another animal cruelty is with dogs, people seem to think that fighting is a dogÃ¢â¬â¢s nature. Dogs are not the same as humans, but dogs do feel physical pain. Just because a dog cant say That hurts! doesnt mean they dont feel pain. Dogs also suffer from feelings such as loneliness when left chained. Thats why they howl and bark, to try and get some attention and if they are ignored dogs stops howling, its because hes given up hope. So much cruelty is involved in dogfighting. Dogs are tortured to make them violent. Kittens and puppies are used as bait to teach dogs to kill. Illegal drugs and weapons are usual at dogfights. Fighting dogs usually live on chains their whole lives. Other animal cruelty we see is when they make experiments on animals, like monkeys, mouse, gineapigs etc. Monkeys and others animals do not have identical immune systems as humans, and may not respond to drugs or vaccines in the same way. Animals are often depressed alternatives for humans, and some mixtures that may well cause no harm to an animal, could seriously harm a human being. Also, a drug that is toxic to the animal it is tested on may have no toxicity, and even healing benefits in humans. Pain and suffering still occur, and simply being in captivity can cause great distress to animals, just as it would to a human. We most of the times forget the pain and suffering we are causing to animals, we use them as objects of study, rather than live creatures, and this can mean they are treated as disposable rather than indispensable.
Friday, November 15, 2019
Throughout Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare, there is an overlaying presence of the typical roles that men and women were supposed to play. During Elizabethan times there was a major difference between the way men and women were supposed to act. Men typically were supposed to be masculine and powerful, and defend the honor. Women, on the other hand, were supposed to be subservient to their men in their lives and do as ever they wished. In Romeo and Juliet the typical gender roles that men and women were supposed to play had an influence on the fate of their lives. The beginning of Act one opens with a brawl in the street between the servants of the Capulets and the Montagues. The origin of the fight introduces the important theme of masculine honor. Sampson, one of Capulets servants, shows this masculinity by saying, Ã¢â¬Å"Draw, if you be men.Ã¢â¬ (I.i.64). Later on in the play in Act II, scene i. the display of honor and masculinity comes up again during the fight between Mercutio and Tybault. As Mercutio lay slain Romeo says to him, Ã¢â¬Å"Courage, man. The hurt cannot be much.Ã¢â¬ (III.i.96). Even as his friend is dying the two men try and act masculine because they did not want to show their fears. But on the other side of this masculinity is love. For Elizabethan society believed that a man who loved too much lost his masculinity. Romeo clearly subscribes to that belief when he states that his love for Juliet made him Ã¢â¬Å"effeminate.Ã¢â¬ During Elizabethan times wo...